Remdesivir and corticosteroids in the treatment of hospitalized COVID

Scientific Reports volume 13, Article number: 4482 (2023) Cite this article

3703 Accesses

4 Altmetric

Metrics details

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic infection caused by the newly discovered severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Remdesivir (RDV) and corticosteroids are used mainly in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure. The main objective of the study was to assess the effectiveness of remdesivir with and without corticosteroids in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. We conducted a prospective observational study, including adult patients consecutively hospitalized with confirmed COVID-19 and acute respiratory failure. Patients were divided according to treatment strategy: RDV alone versus RDV with corticosteroids. The primary outcome was the time to recovery in both treatment groups. We included 374 COVID-19 adult patients, 184 were treated with RDV, and 190 were treated with RDV and corticosteroid. Patients in the RDV group had a shorter time to recovery in comparison with patients in the RDV plus corticosteroids group at 28 days after admission [11 vs. 16 days (95% confidence Interval 9.7–12.8; 14.9–17.1; p = .016)]. Patients treated with RDV alone had a shorter length of hospital stay. The use of corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy of RDV was not associated with improvement in mortality of COVID-19 patients.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic infection caused by the newly discovered severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2). The first cases of the disease emerged in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 and quickly spread across the globe infecting millions of people and causing more than 5 million deaths1.

Since COVID-19 was declared a global pandemic, several treatments have been tested, but so far few have been shown to have significantly decreased the mortality of COVID-19 patients. Currently, supportive care measures such as mechanical ventilation, oxygenation, and fluid management remain the standard of care2.

Several classes of drugs have been tested, particularly in patients with moderate to severe infection, including several antiviral agents. One of these agents is remdesivir (RDV), an RNA-dependent polymerase inhibitor, developed in 2017 as a treatment for Ebola virus infection3. In July 2020, European Medicines Agency (EMA) granted this antiviral a conditional marketing authorisation for COVID-19 treatment. RDV efficacy and safety profile were evaluated in NIAID ACTT-1, a randomized double blind placebo controlled trial and further scrutinized in the ACTT-2 and ACTT-33,4,5. The clinical benefit of remdesivir was most apparent in patients receiving oxygen, and not on invasive mechanical ventilation at Day 1.

Immunomodulatory drugs, such as corticosteroids, to control the hyperinflammatory response frequently seen in COVID-19 infection, have also been studied. So far, some studies have shown that the use of corticosteroids could reduce the risk of 28-day mortality, namely in patients under mechanical ventilation6.

The main objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of remdesivir with and without corticosteroids in the treatment of COVID-19 patients in a Portuguese Hospital Centre.

We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of COVID-19 patients treated with RDV alone or with the association of RDV plus corticosteroids, collecting data since RDV’s approval, from June 2020 to December 2020. Eligible patients included adults consecutively hospitalized with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and acute respiratory. Patients included in the RDV plus corticosteroids group were treated with dexamethasone 6 mg/day for 10 days, or until discharge or death.

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental and conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All of the authors vouched for the accuracy and completeness of the data. The informed consent was waived by the ethical committee since the study was observational and there was no diagnostic or therapeutic intervention outside the usual clinical practice or the need for additional collection of biological samples.

We obtained data through our institution’s electronic medical records (EMRs).

The primary endpoint was the time to recovery in both treatment groups. Clinical status was assessed at 28 days to evaluate effectiveness of drug treatments. Clinical recovery on D28 was defined as a decrease of up to 1 or 2 points on the ordinal scale or live discharge was also evaluated.

Secondary endpoints were the cumulative mortality through day 28, the scores on the World Health Organization (WHO) ordinal scale (OS) of disease severity at day 28, the status of being alive and not using mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) at day 28, and not being hospitalized at day 28. The incidence of adverse events was monitored and assessed.

All data are expressed as mean to Gaussian distributed variables and as medians [with interquartile range (IQR)] to non-normally distributed variables unless specified otherwise. Comparisons between groups were performed with unpaired Student's t-test, one-way ANOVA, Mann–Whitney U or Kruskal–Wallis H-tests for continuous variables according to data distribution. Chi-square tests were used to carry out comparisons between categorical variables. Linear logistic regression modelling for time to recovery was carried. Kaplan–Meier survival curve and log-rank test were also obtained to ascertain and compare survival between groups. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed with adjustment for comorbidities or severity of patients evaluated by WHO Ordinal Scale. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered for statistical significance and usual confidence intervals of 95% were chosen. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software version 26.0 (Supplementary Information 1).

Of the 374 included patients, 184 were treated with RDV and 190 were treated with RDV and corticosteroid (Fig. 1). Our population included 298 patients with moderate disease (ordinal score of 5, requiring supplemental oxygen) and 76 with severe disease (ordinal score of 6 or 7, receiving non-invasive or invasive ventilation).

Patient distribution.

The mean age of the patients was 67.3 years, 67.9% were male, 64.3% were obese or overweight, and the median time from symptoms to RDV therapy was 7 days. One or more coexisting conditions were present in 75.1% of the patients. Patients in the group of RDV plus corticosteroids presented a significant higher severity in the evaluation OS (p = 0.016). The overall hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients was 13.9% (Table 1). No significant differences were observed between comorbidities in both groups (Table 2).

Patients in the RDV group had a shorter time to recovery in comparison with patients in the RDV plus corticosteroids group at 28 days after admission [11 vs. 16 days (95% confidence Interval (CI) 9.7–12.8; 14.9–17.1; p = 0.016)].

Also, hospital free days at 28 days were higher in the RDV group [13.8 vs. 11.5 days, (95% CI 12.5–15; 10.3–12.6; p = 0.001)]. Overall, the length of hospital stay of patients treated with RDV was shorter than that of patients in the RDV plus corticosteroids group [17.6 vs 21.7 days; (95% CI 15.1–20.1; 18.6–24.8; p = 0.001)].

Patients treated with RDV alone presented a lower, although not significant, mortality (12.5% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.44). The Kaplan–Meier survival curves at day 28 showed no difference between survivors and non-survivors (log-rank test of 0.477) between groups, even after adjustment for comorbidities or severity of patients evaluated by WHO Ordinal Scale [OS = 6: HR = 1.12 (95% CI 0.47–2.68; p = 0.78); OS = 7: HR = 1.66 (95% CI 0.5–5.4; p = 0.40] (Fig. 2).

Kaplan–Meier Survival curves of patients treated with remdesivir and the association of remdesivir and corticosteroids adjusted for WHO Ordinal Scale severity and comorbidities.

Adverse events or severe adverse events other than death were identified in 20 patients (10.9%) in the RDV group and in 16 patients (8.4%) in the RDV plus corticosteroid group (p = 0.422) (Table 3).

In our study we found that the combination of corticosteroids with remdesivir did not improve the time to clinical recovery of patients with COVID-19 in comparison with RDV alone. Also, the hospital length of stay of patients treated with remdesivir alone was significantly lower than patients treated with both drugs.

Although the anti-inflammatory effect of corticosteroids could improve the hyperinflammatory state probably associated with COVID-19 pneumonia, its use is associated with several potential serious adverse effects. Such examples include: higher incidence of hospital-acquired infections, hyperglycemia, delirium or neuromuscular weakness that could compromise the recovery of patients and increase the length of hospital stay7. Nevertheless, the adverse effects of corticosteroids were not systematically evaluated in our study, which could explain our findings in the time to clinical recovery and the length of stay.

Corticosteroids emerged as a treatment of COVID-19 patients after the RECOVERY trial that showed significantly higher survival in patients under invasive mechanical ventilation and on supplemental oxygen receiving dexamethasone8. However, the results in several randomized controlled trials (RCT) have been sometimes controversial8,9,10,11. Tomazini et al. showed that dexamethasone had a mean 6.6 versus 4.0 ventilator-free days in controls (P = 0.04)9. But there was no significant difference in 28-day all-cause mortality (56.3 vs. 61.5%) or in other clinical endpoints. Similarly, in the REMAP-CAP COVID-19 RCT, hydrocortisone had no impact in hospital mortality rates (30%, 26% and 33% in the fixed-dose, shock-dependent and no hydrocortisone, respectively)10. More recently, Dupuis et al.11 found in a cohort of 303 COVID-19 patients that early corticosteroid treatment was not associated with patient survival. The various randomized studies presented very different mortalities of patients with similar severities, so it is difficult to consistently assess the impact of corticosteroids on the mortality of COVID-19 patients. Also, in the study by Jung et al., the treatment with corticosteroids in COVID-19 patients with 70 years and older was associated with increased mortality. In our study, there were no difference in the mortality rate of patients treated with RDV and the association of RDV with corticosteroids. On the contrary, patients treated with corticosteroids presents a slightly higher, although not significant, mortality12. It should be noted that patients treated with corticosteroids were more severe at admission in the evaluation of OS. When adjustments for severity were made in the evaluation of mortality, the tendencies to higher mortality remained. Also, no impact of comorbidities was observed in the outcome.

In other studies3,4,5,13, treatment with remdesivir has not been shown to improve mortality. In our study, the combination with corticosteroids did not improve mortality. Monotherapy with remdesivir was better in improving time to recovery and in reducing the length of hospital stay. In the pandemic context, these results could be very useful to release resources for the treatment of increasing numbers of infected patients. Also, in a recent study comparing baricitinib plus remdesivir and dexamethasone plus remdesivir, similar mechanical ventilation-free survival by day 29 was found. However, the corticosteroid arm was associated with significantly more adverse events, treatment-related adverse events, and severe or life-threatening adverse events14.

The current safety profile of remdesivir is still incomplete. Increasing evidence has demonstrated that COVID-19 is associated with multiple organ involvement including lung, liver, gastrointestinal tract, heart, and kidney. It is therefore complex to distinguish the underlying causes of adverse events during remdesivir treatment15. In our study, the incidence of adverse effects associated with RDV was similar to that observed in other studies3,4,5,13

Our study is not a randomized controlled study, and could therefore have a significant bias in the distribution of patients between both treatment groups. However, being a real-life study, results are reinforced with a robust structure and prospectively collected data.

Also, the homogeneity of the compared groups limits some potential biases on the analysed outcomes.

In this study, patients treated with RDV alone had a shorter length of hospital stay. The use of corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy of RDV was not associated with improvement in mortality of COVID-19 patients. These results raise the question whether corticosteroids represent a real advantage in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. In near future, the results of other trials could help define the role of RDV and corticosteroids in the treatment of COVID-19 patients.

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Zhu, N. et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 382(8), 727–733. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Gavriatopoulou, M. et al. Emerging treatment strategies for COVID-19 infection. Clin. Exp. Med. 21(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-020-00671-y (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Beigel, J. H. et al. Remdesivir for the treatment of Covid-19 - final report. N. Engl. J. Med. 383(19), 1813–1826. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2007764 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Kalil, A. C. et al. Efficacy of interferon beta-1a plus remdesivir compared with remdesivir alone in hospitalised adults with COVID-19: A double-bind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 9(12), 1365–1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00384-2 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Kalil, A. C. et al. Baricitinib plus remdesivir for hospitalized adults with Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 384(9), 795–807. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2031994 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Group WHOREAfC-TW et al. Association between administration of systemic corticosteroids and mortality among critically Ill patients with COVID-19: A meta-analysis. JAMA 324(13), 1330–13341. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.17023 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Grennan, D. & Wang, S. Steroid side effects. JAMA 322(3), 282. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.8506 (2019).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Group RC et al. Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19 - preliminary report. N. Engl. J. Med. 384(8), 693–704. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2021436 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Tomazini, B. M. et al. Effect of dexamethasone on days alive and ventilator-free in patients with moderate or severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and COVID-19: The CoDEX randomized clinical trial. JAMA 324(13), 1307–1316. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.17021 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Angus, D. C. et al. Effect of hydrocortisone on mortality and organ support in patients with severe COVID-19: The REMAP-CAP COVID-19 corticosteroid domain randomized clinical trial. JAMA 324(13), 1317–1329. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.17022 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Dupuis, C. et al. Impact of early corticosteroids on 60-day mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A multicenter cohort study of the OUTCOMEREA network. PLoS ONE 16(8), e0255644. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255644 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Jung, C. et al. Steroid use in elderly critically ill COVID-19 patients. Eur. Respir. J. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00979-2021 (2021).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Olender, S. A. et al. Remdesivir for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) versus a cohort receiving standard of care. Clin. Infect. Dis. 73(11), e4166–e4174. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1041 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Wolfe, C. R. et al. Baricitinib versus dexamethasone for adults hospitalised with COVID-19 (ACTT-4): A randomised, double-blind, double placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 10(9), 888–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00088-1 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Fan, Q., Zhang, B., Ma, J. & Zhang, S. Safety profile of the antiviral drug remdesivir: An update. Biomed. Pharmacother. 1(30), 110532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110532 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit, Hospital de São Francisco Xavier, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal

Luís Coelho & Pedro Póvoa

NOVA Medical School, CHRC, New University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal

Luís Coelho, Pedro Póvoa, Candida Fonseca, Luis Campos, Kamal Mansinho & Isabel Aldir

Pharmacy Department, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal

Fatima Falcão, Erica Viegas, Inês Carmo, Joana Soares, Mariana Solano & Dina Mendes

Faculty of Pharmacy of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal

Fatima Falcão, Erica Viegas, Ana Mirco & Helena Farinha

Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Research Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, OUH Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

Pedro Póvoa

Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Hospital de S. Francisco Xavier, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal

Antonio Pais Martins

Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit, Hospital de Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal

Eduarda Carmo

Internal Medicine, Hospital de S. Francisco Xavier, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal

Candida Fonseca, Luis Campos & Antonio Carvalho

Infecciology, Hospital de Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal

Kamal Mansinho, Ana Cláudia Miranda & Isabel Aldir

Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal

Antonio Carvalho, Ana Mirco, Helena Farinha, Isabel Aldir & José Correia

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by all authors. The first draft of the manuscript was written by L.C., F.F. and P.P. and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Luís Coelho.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Coelho, L., Falcão, F., Póvoa, P. et al. Remdesivir and corticosteroids in the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Sci Rep 13, 4482 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31544-5

Download citation

Received: 15 July 2022

Accepted: 14 March 2023

Published: 18 March 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31544-5

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.